ITF Digital

Survey-ready records for healthcare facilities

Policy control, staff credential expiries and facility rounds for hospitals, polyclinics and laboratories working toward a CBAHI survey.

CBAHI surveys Saudi healthcare facilities against its standards, and for hospitals accreditation is tied to renewal of the operating licence. We build the non-clinical record layer a survey looks at: policies under revision control, staff credential and training expiries, facility rounds, and an index that maps each standard to its evidence.

Left, one policy revision: drafted by the policy owner, approved by the quality director, issued to every branch with variations kept as variations, and acknowledged by staff on their phones, with those who have not yet acknowledged listed by name. A highlighted line carries it into a survey index on the right that maps each standard to its evidence: policy standards to the policy and acknowledgements, staff files to the credential register, facility safety to round records, equipment to the maintenance register, incidents to the incident log. Below the index, a licence expiry escalates to the staff member at the lead time, then the department head, then the quality director. Along the bottom: on the day, the survey team opens one index.ONE REVISION, FOLLOWEDREVISION DRAFTEDBY THE POLICY OWNERAPPROVEDBY THE QUALITY DIRECTORISSUED TO EVERY BRANCHVARIATIONS KEPT AS VARIATIONSACKNOWLEDGED BY STAFFSIGNED ON THEIR PHONESNOT YETLISTED BY NAMETHE SURVEY INDEXSTANDARD / EVIDENCEPOLICY STANDARDSPOLICY + ACKSSTAFF FILESCREDENTIAL REGISTERFACILITY SAFETYROUND RECORDSEQUIPMENTMAINTENANCE REGISTERINCIDENTSINCIDENT LOGONE LICENCE, BEFORE IT LAPSES1THE STAFF MEMBER, AT LEAD TIME2THE DEPARTMENT HEAD, NEXT3THE QUALITY DIRECTOR, LASTON THE DAYTHE SURVEY TEAM OPENS ONE INDEXEACH STANDARD LEADS TO THE DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS THAT EVIDENCE IT
One revision, followed to the surveyApproved once, acknowledged by name, indexed to its standardSwipe to pan
01

Most standards are proven by a document

A CBAHI survey assesses a facility against clinical and non-clinical standards, and many of them are evidenced by a policy that exists, is approved, is current, and is known to the staff who must follow it. Policies drift across branches, review dates pass, and the proof that staff read the new revision sits on a signed sheet in a supervisor's drawer. Credentials drift the same way: a licence renewal date passes during annual leave, and it surfaces when the survey team asks for the staff file.

  • Each branch keeps its own copy of the policy manual, and the copies drift apart
  • Review dates pass without anyone being told they have
  • Acknowledgement of a new revision is a signed sheet in a drawer
  • Professional licence and life-support certification expiries are tracked by memory
  • Facility and fire safety rounds are done on paper and filed by month rather than by finding
03

Records a survey looks at

Each of these is evidenced by a document or a register. The software keeps them current, and the people named in each row decide what they say.

RequirementWhat it means on site
Policies and proceduresApproved by your quality director, with review dates that raise their own task. Branch variations are approved and recorded as variations of one policy.
Read-and-acknowledge recordsStaff acknowledge a new revision on their phones, and the record shows who has not yet.
Professional licences and life-support certificationHeld per staff member with expiry dates, confirmed by the department head, and escalated ahead of a lapse.
Facility and fire safety roundsCaptured on a phone per area, with each finding tracked to closure.
Medical equipment maintenanceThe register and its evidence sit here. The maintenance itself stays with biomedical engineering, who close each entry.
Facility and staff incident reportsRaised, investigated and closed with an owner. Where one relates to a clinical event, it carries the reference number from your clinical system.
The survey indexEach standard mapped to the documents and records that evidence it, so the survey team works from one index.
04

Questions from quality directors

Q01

Who decides what a policy says?

Your quality director approves every revision and decides branch variations, and department heads confirm credential records. The software routes each revision to the quality director, records the approval and its date, and issues the approved revision to every branch for acknowledgement.

Q02

How does this sit next to our clinical system?

Side by side. Clinical records stay in your clinical system, and when a round or an incident needs to point at a clinical event, the record carries that system's reference number so the two stay linked.

Q03

Can laboratories use this for ISO 15189?

The document control and credential records apply to a laboratory as they do to a hospital, so a later ISO 15189 project finds them already running. ITF Health's laboratories page covers the facility, safety and staff-file side of a laboratory survey.

Q04

What does a typical engagement look like?

A polyclinic group in Riyadh with three branches has a CBAHI survey due, and each branch keeps its own copy of the policy manual, which have drifted apart. The policies are brought into one register, with approved branch variations recorded as variations rather than as separate documents, and the quality director approves each current revision. Staff acknowledge new revisions on their phones, and the record shows who has not. Licence and life-support certification expiries sit in one register that escalates to the department head. The group holds one policy register, acknowledgement records per revision, the credential register and an index mapping each standard to the documents that evidence it.

Start from your survey date

The systems audit maps the standards your survey will test against the documents and registers you hold today, and shows which ones would be hard to find on the day.

Book a systems audit